State of New South Wales v Bradford James Robinson

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

4 December 2019

STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES v BRADFORD JAMES ROBINSON
[2019] HCA 46

Today the High Court dismissed an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales concerning the power of a police officer to arrest a person, without a warrant, under s99 of the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) (“the Act”) when, at the time of the arrest, the officer had not formed the intention to charge the arrested person with an offence. A majority of the High Court held that s 99 of the Act does not confer a power to arrest a person in suchcircumstances.

An Apprehended Violence Order (“AVO”) restrained Mr Robinson from certain conduct. When Mr Robinson voluntarily entered Sydney City Police Station, a constable arrested him and told him he was being arrested for breaching the AVO. The constable had no intention, at the time of the arrest, of bringing Mr Robinson before an authorised officer to be dealt with according to law unless it later emerged that there was sufficient reason to charge him. The constable offered Mr Robinson the opportunity of an interview, which heaccepted. At the end of the interview Mr Robinson was released withoutcharge.

Mr Robinson brought a claim for damages for wrongful arrest and false imprisonment, which the State of New South Wales (“the State”) defended on the basis that the arrest was authorised by the Act. Mr Robinson was unsuccessful in the District Court. The Court of Appeal allowed his appeal. In this Court, the State submitted that, on a proper construction of s 99 of the Act, the Court of Appeal erred in finding that at the time of arrest the arresting police officer must have formed a positive intention to charge the arrested person with anoffence.

Section 99(1) stipulates conditions for arrest without a warrant, namely that “the police officer suspects on reasonable grounds that the person is committing or has committed an offence” and that “the police officer is satisfied that the arrest is reasonably necessary for any one or more” of specified reasons. Pursuant to s 99(3), a police officer who arrests a person under s 99 must, as soon as is reasonably practicable, take the person before a magistrate (or other authorised officer) to be dealt with according to law.

The High Court unanimously held that in New South Wales, at common law, an arrest can only be for the purpose of taking the arrested person before a magistrate (or other authorised officer) to be dealt with according to law to answer a charge for an offence (“the single criterion”). Nothing in the Act displaced that single criterion. An arrest under s 99 can only be for the purpose, as soon as is reasonably practicable, of taking the arrested person before a magistrate (or other authorised officer) to be dealt with according to law to answer a charge for an offence. A majority of the High Court held that it followed that the constable did not have the power to arrest Mr Robinson pursuant to s 99 when, at the time of the arrest, the constable had not formed the intention to charge him. The arrest was unlawful.

This statement is not intended to be a substitute for the reasons of the High Court or to be used in any later consideration of the Courts reasons.

PleasedirectenquiriestoBenWickham,SeniorExecutiveDeputyRegistrar
Telephone: (02)62706893 Fax: (02) 62706868

Email:enquiries@hcourt.gov.au Website:www.hcourt.gov.au

Trusted Legal Advice

With over 30 years of legal expertise, and professional and experienced lawyers on board, Marocchi Law can assist you with a range of legal matters. Our team are by your side when you need legal assistance, working to ensure the best outcome for you.

CALL NOW: 1300 727 266

Latest Articles

Frequently
Asked Questions

Can We Help?
Your questions, answered.
Check out questions asked by others like you.
Who Can Make a Will?
Anyone over the age of 18, and anyone under the age of 18 who is married or contemplating marriage can make a will as long as they have testamentary capacity. People under 18 who are unmarried, can make a Will with the approval of the Court.
How Much Compensation Will I Receive Through a Personal Injury Claim?
A commonly asked question however the answer isn’t straightforward as it depends on a number of factors around your claim. We recommend you make an appointment with one of our Personal Injury lawyers to discuss your claim.
Do I Need a Lawyer to Help with a Super Claim
If you have what is considered a complex super claim, a specialist lawyer will be able to help you navigate your way through your Super Fund’s T & C’s to ensure you get what you’re entitled to. Every claim is unique, as is the service we provide.
What is Stamp Duty? Will I Need to Pay It?
Stamp duty is a property tax imposed by each State Government and the amount varies from state to state. You are required to pay stamp duty on purchasing a property, however you may also be entitled to some concessions. Talk to one of our experienced Conveyancers to find out more about how stamp duty will affect your overall property purchase and any concessions you might be entitled to.
What Are My Rights if I am Arrested?
If you are arrested, you have the right to phone a lawyer of your choice. You will initially speak to them via the phone, and if retained, they will attend the police station or watch house depending on the time of day and availability. A defence lawyer will ensure that your rights to the presumption of innocence until proven guilty are me, and they can explain the process and your charges to you.

Contact Us

     

    Level 5, 75 Elizabeth Street Sydney NSW 2000